REACHING STUDENTS

How do you “reach to teach” students? I don’t know. I’m not sure that e-mail, journals, discussions, varying styles, or whatever methods and techniques anyone may use to reach students is the seminal issue. And, I don’t know if there is any one formula, one set of methods and techniques for successfully reaching students, that fits all sizes. I do know, however, the formula for failure:

1. treat every student in every class as the same
2. keep doing the same thing over and over again until you’re comfortable and its routine
3. be satisfied with and judge successful only those things that go the way you want them to
4. take the easy and comfortable road instead of the risky and right one
5. don’t be concerned with the kind of people the students will be after they leave the classroom and the kind of society they will live in
6. act removed and superhuman, be taken with yourself, and hide your foibles so that the students cannot say, “you’re just like us”
7. do not truly believe in and trust yourself
8. concentrate so much on information transmission, be so intellectual, that the heart is besides the point
9. when the heart of the educational matter, the humanity of both you and the student, is wrapped in reams of lecture notes and administrative memos and test booklets, and is obscured.

Make it a good day.

–Louis–

REMEMBERING SAMANTHA–A REPLY

FROM PERSON Y:

I just finished reading about Samantha and I’m stuck. I can’t stop myself from asking over and over again, Louis — how did you know? Not about the things that Samantha alluded to regarding her walls, but that you needed to “back off”. As I read your “thoughts” I was fighting a voice in side of me that kept asking — what would I do in that same situation. And, I am left with no answer. And, that’s why I truly want to know — “How did you know”? This matters a great deal to me.

REPLY:

You are not the only one who has asked me this question. More than a few people on this and other lists, on-list and off-list, have asked me the same thing. But, you’ve phrased your question in a way that you gave me a few restless hours last night. In fact, I just came back from walking “on it”, as they say down here in south Georgia. Maybe someone who knows me and knows what I’ve been through, someone like Rick Garlikov, could answer your question that better than I can. I don’t have a pat answer, and I’m not sure I have the adequate command of language. If fact, I’m not sure words can properly be used in an answer. It’s almost like you’ve got to be there. I have nothing I can put either my or your finger on, but it is a question that I can’t ignore or leave for a surrogate to answer. So, here goes.

I think part of the answer–maybe the entire answer-lies in MY attitude. No, in ME. I work hard at being more than cerebral because I think teaching is more than cerebral. I think it is emotional, perhaps spiritual, as well. I believe in what I suppose might be called “wholeness education”, maybe “risk education.” I think a teacher has to go beyond the safety of subject mastery and reach to teach: reach out to the person of the student as well as reach within to the person of him/herself.

I think the most important question to ask and answer about my subject is “why”, not “what.” I think it should be no less with a student. I believe in the Humanity of Teaching. I believe you cannot address the intellect and ignore the spirit; I have an unshakeable belief as a result of personal discovery that nothing is more driving and stronger than the indefinable, often untapped, hidden, buried human spirit within us. Maybe you would feel more comfortable if I used the word, attitude, instead of spirit. So, I am as concerned with attitude, perhaps more so, as well as effort and performance. I believe education is an unending journey of boundless learning rather than a destination of getting a grade. I believe that my concerns as both a teacher and human being should extend beyond both the barriers of the subject matter and the classroom walls. I am more concerned with what kind of persons the students are when they enter the classroom and what kind of persons they will be when they leave the classroom than the amount of information they supposedly will have gathered and what grade they will have received. My view of education and teaching is more qualitative than quantitative; I am, admittedly, a psychometrican’s nightmare. I think Samantha, in her own way, summed up my attitude. I am more impressed with a student struggling to be a whole “honors person” than with one settling for being just a unidimensional “honors student.” I am more concerned with the person than the student.

I don’t mean to be facetious when I say part of the answer is my “blueberries,” a meditation, a concentration, a feeling, a consciousness, a sensitivity and awareness, a sincere caring; respecting each student’s individuality, being tuned in as best I can to each student’s humanity, heeding the call of each student’s spirit, asking “why” and not merely being satisfied with describing “what”, closely reading what each of them are saying in body language, vocal tones, facial expressions; seeing instead of just looking; listening instead of hearing.

I guess it’s also a matter of having gone through personal crisis, though not abuse, having been forced to face myself, of discovering and coming out from behind my own walls, forever taking an inventory of myself, always challenging, defining and redefining myself always alert for the demonic spirits of the past to grab me in their clutches and pull me back, of coming to understand the role attitude plays in each of ours lives, and being able to say “I understand something about the pain; I understand something about feeling unworthy; I can relate to feeling unloved; I’ve been there.” Maybe it’s just a simple matter of being as human and real and compassionate as I can at the moment. Maybe it’s also having a fear of stepping over the edge–fear and questioning are children of examination–of struggling to implement the serenity prayer, that forces me to be sensitive to the sitaution and not be so self-righteous that I unhesitatingly, like a bull in a china shop, think I have the magic wand that can turn all pumpkins in coaches.

I’m not sure I’m being all that clear and precise. I’m not sure I can be. In the last analysis, what YOU do in the same situation depends on YOU, who YOU are. It doesn’t depend on ME and who I am. It depends on what YOUR inner voices tell you should be done and whether YOU have the courage to follow them, not on what MY voice says to do and whether I have the courage to follow them.

Make it a good day.

–Louis–

REMEMBERING SAMANTHA

It was crisp and black this morning. There was nothing on my mind. After I returned from my walk, I grabbed a cup of freshly brewed coffee, went into the spare bedroom where my computer never sleeps, and continued an off-list discussion I was having with an e-mail friend about how and whether we professors should and could be one person and many teachers at the same time, how and whether we can play each note and the entire chord at the same time, and how to react when we fail to strike a key or when we strike a key and there’s no sound. I told him that we are pulled in the directions of our beliefs. We do and must do the best at the moment with the sensitivity, the caring, the kindness, the power and authority, the ability, and talent we have no matter how small.

I no sooner had sent him my message, when a sudden host of memories of Samantha (not her real name) swirled unannounced into my mind. I occasionally think of her, wonder if she still on campus, how she is doing. I haven’t seen her in over a year. She was an honors student in one of my regular first year classes, one of those students who are easy to teach; who has an enthusiasm, is always prepared, never disappoints, does well on tests, grasps concepts, actively participates; who other teachers call “exceptionally bright.” In fact, one of my colleagues made a point to call me when she heard Samantha was going to be in my class to say that she was “a good student” and always “happy and alive–and “will even laugh at your lousy puns.”

When Samantha first came into class, there was the cherub-like smile on her face and twinkle in her eyes. She did walk with a skip in each step. But, from the very first day of class, I sensed something even though I didn’t know what it was. During our biographical exercises I remember writing a note that asked, “a facade?”

I remember Samantha’s annoyance at one of her classmates who politely and rightly commented on her not being prepared with her part of a group assignment. I remember her unexpected outburst of anger at me during a private conversation on the hall floor in front of my office the following week that went something like:

“What’s going on,” I asked. “You’re not you lately. Did I do anything? Are we cool?”

“I don’t like being criticized,” to retorted in almost a reflex. “He had no right to do that and you didn’t say anything.”

“We are respectfully honest with each other. You know that. It’s more than that. The comment was insignificant. Are you happy,” I innocently asked.

“What makes you think that,” she blurted out with a surprise.

“I don’t know. Just a gut feeling.” I answered with a quiet, calm tone. “The last couple of days you coldly walk into class and sit down without acknowledging anyone. You’ve shut down and gone quiet. You sit in class almost brooding. You don’t seem to trust anyone. Something is suddenly holding you back. You’ve had a look of pain in your eyes.”

“Who’s been talking to you about me? Who have you gone to?” she exploded.

“No one,” I quietly replied with my “blueberries” suddenly turned on to full alert.

A mixture of water and mascara unexpectedly gushed from her eyes turning her bright face into a macabre mask. Her lips grimaced. Her cheeks tightened. She rose up from the floor, abruptly turned her back to me, and stomped off. I sat there for a moment thinking to myself, “Back off. You’re near the edge. There’s deep shit here. Let it go.”

I remember the change of tone in Samantha’s journal entries after that day. Gone was the shallow chit-chat. She suddenly started writing about being sexually abused until puberty, of being physically abused regularly, of feeling guilty, unclean, unloved, and unwanted, of being told she would never amount to anything.

I remember her entries describing how she had taken these events over the edge of memory to hide them from herself and others, and to protect herself from the lurid outside world behind high, thick, defensive walls, bleak and dark on the inner side, deliberately and deceptively bright and decorative on the exterior. And, I didn’t say a word about it.

I remember Samantha and how she described grades as a means of instilling a sense of worth, of being seen, of being noticed, of being wanted and needed. I remember Samantha cursing me in her journal for being the only one to have sensed the very existence of these walls she thought she had so masterfully disguised from herself and all others. I remember one entry that began, “Damn you for caring. No one is supposed to care.” And, I didn’t say a word about it and consciously struggled hard not to open my mouth, not to let a word or phrase slip out or say anything in my body language.

I remember Samantha during the last third of the course slowly getting her smile back. A slight bounce reappeared in her pace. She began to return part way to her old academic self. She brought in a tap or two for the boom box. Her journal entries lost their seriousness, and returned to the light small talk and chatter of her initial entries. Was she slowly retreating back behind her walls and slowly closing the gates after her? But, she wasn’t completely her old self, and in a way I was glad. I was troubled. I was concerned. But, I still kept my mouth shut. I still consciously worked hard not to let if affect how I acted towards her in class.

As the class ran its course, not a day went by that I didn’t think of Samantha. Do I have a right to knock on her gates? Was I abusing my position as a professor and imposing myself where I wasn’t wanted? Is my concern and compassion for the students too intrusive? Should I have told her what she wanted to hear rather than what I thought she needed to hear? Was all this any of my affair? Or, should I take the easy way, just convince myself that “it not any of my concern,” and just keep my nose in my subject? I asked our campus counselors for answers, and got none.

My answer came, at least as far as Samantha was concerned, in an end-of-class bag of Tootsie Pops wrapped in a ribbon with a note of thank you. It came from Samantha. She appreciated that I didn’t impose myself on her or intrude in her life after that conversation, or change my attitude towards her for the rest of the class. She understood that she had to find her own way. She had not been happy that I had knocked on the gates of her walled redoubt. But, she said, if she was so happy inside how could I have sensed a sadness; if she was so unworthy, how could I see a worthiness; if she was so comfortable inside why was the place wrecked by alcohol, drugs, and rampant sex. If the wall protected her, they also imprisoned her. She now wanted out. I remember to this day her writing, “I see now that the higher I build my walls, the more I tear myself down. I am tired of being an honors student. I want to be the honors person you see hidden inside me. I know now that only I can dig hard and deep to find her.” But, she knew now that she would have to get professional help to open those gates and walk out into the world beyond.

And I didn’t say a word about it when next we met. As I said, I haven’t seen her for over a year. I wonder how she’s doing.

Thinking about Samantha now, I would add to my message to my friend only this: touching one person out of many, touching one person however intentional or inadvertent, however slightly or deeply, however immediate or long- range, however obvious or hidden, is never small.

Make it a good day.

–Louis–

THE CLASSROOM IS A GARDEN, IV

Great walk this morning. It was one of those “not too….” mornings: not too cold, not to warm, not too wet. Just right. As I gleefully glided through this air, that was so was clean and crisp it reminded me what being alive was all about, I was thinking some more summery thoughts about my garden and my classes.

You know, no where in my yard, or in any other yard I passed this morning for that matter, is there one hint, not one shred of evidence, one shriveled leaf, that the “typical plant” which would make gardening ever so easy ever grew. Instead, in my relatively small plot of land grows a large assortment of flora: bulbs, rhizomes, comes, annuals, biennials, perennial, grasses, bushes, shrubs, hedges, trees; spring bloomers, summer bloomers, fall bloomers; ornamental and cacti; a host of hardy and cold sensitive; diverse color, varied sun-tolerances, different space needs, different water needs, separate nutrient requirements, set at various depths, growing at various heights; exploding into countless sizes and shapes, emitting a mixture of smells, being susceptible to an assortment of different pests and diseases. I suppose you think that I could make it easy for myself by planting only one kind of flower. The problem with that is that each flower has its own profusion of varieties each of which has its own particular needs and characteristics.

There are times, when I am tired, as I look squint my sweat stinging eyes, that I resignly mutter in a mixed mood of frustration and challenge, “There are so many different plants with so many different needs, and I am only one person. So many different plants with so many different needs, and I must be many different gardeners if I want each plant to have the chance to come to full bloom and don’t want to angrily wrap a hoe or two around a tree in frustration.”

It’s no different in my classes. It’s the beginning of the quarter. I’ve been working hard to make contact with my students. I’ve been going over 122 written biographical interviews, self-describing exercises, and initial journal entries from two classes. I’ve been watching each student introduce him/herself to the others in the class and share with them. I’ve been small talking before, during and after class with as many as I can. I’ve been watching their body language, facial expressions, listening to their tonal inflections, noticing their idiosyncracies as they play some critical thinking games, engage in such bonding and trust exercises as standing up and singing solo in class or falling backward from the top of a desk into the arms of others. I’ve been watching and listening and talking, watching and listening and noticing, watching and listening and……….

Such diversity: a confusion of likes, dislikes, expectations, hesitations, and reservations. So many different attitudes and feeling about themselves; so many different skill levels; so many different learning styles and habits; so many different social and cultural backgrounds; so many different age levels. There are “talkers” and “listeners”; there are innocent teenagers and there are working single parents; there are those on scholarship from either the state, the University or their parents and there are those working their way through school; there are the shy and the outgoing; there are first generation college students and grandchildren of intellectuals; there are the learning disabled and the social disabled; there are the self-proclaimed mediocre, poor and outstanding; there are the self-described unimaginative, artistic, and creative; there are the self-characterized ordinary and extra-ordinary; there are the grade-conscious and the learning centered; there are the frightened, curious, and daring; there are the determined and uncertain; there are the confused and informed; there are the confident and insecure; there are so many distracting personal concerns, so many intruding issues, so many problems contesting for attention, so many confusing matters; there are…………; there are……………

And I thought yesterday, as I do especially at the beginning of each quarter, in a fit of combined anxiety and challenge, “So many different students with so many different needs, and I am only one person. So many different students with so many different needs, and I must be many different teachers if I want each student to have the chance to come to full bloom.”

So many of us reduce the students to mental constructs, theoretical images or stereotypes, as that “typical student.” In our haste to pigeonhole, to believe that one size fits all, we seldom think about the diversity of real people none of whom that single size really fits. It almost like gardening with one tool, having one watering and feeding schedule, believing all soils are alike, having on fertilizer formula, planting everything the same way, expecting everything to bloom in unison and uniformly, needing only one pesticide. But I have wandered our campus, calling out, “Oh, ‘typical student’, where are you to make teaching easy?” I have searched the labs. I have ranged through the stacks in the library. I have roamed the halls of the dorms. I have wandered into classrooms. I have searched the dining halls. I have knocked on door. I have carried a lamp held high through the night in my quest. I even peeked into the specimen bottles thinking maybe one of them, having become extinct, is being preserved for posterity, observation, and study. Alas, I couldn’t find one hint, not one shred of evidence, that such a student ever walked our hallowed halls of ivy.

Instead, I always find diversity and individuality. I think teaching and life should come together no less than gardening and life should merge. In both efforts, the goal should be to bring together what should be done and what can be done. And so, I concluded that “one” cannot be the governing word in my classes any more than it is in my garden. The controlling word must be “Many.”

Of course, the problem is that I have my learning style and I have my teaching style, but the students, we so often forget or ignore, are a diverse lot of individuals, and few are like me. I, for example, am totally right hemispheric. I revel in creativity, the big picture, and love to evaluate things. I live in a state of organized chaos. I hate order. I like things to interrupt themselves. But, the class isn’t populated with only that mythical “typical” student who is like me. Some students like to make their own rules; some want to follow procedures; some like to compare and contrast; some like to lead and see where things go; some like to follow and be told where to go. Some like to write; some like to speak; some like creative freedom; some like to go by the book; some love the big picture; and some revel in detail.

As I accepted that reality, I came to see that my challenge in the classroom, no less than it is in my garden, was three-fold: to get to know each student, not just his or her name, but to really know him or her; to transcend my own predisposition of utilizing a particular teaching style; to challenge myself to vary opportunities in a way that fits different students’ kinds of learning styles while challenging them to use others.

I won’t argue that most students, however, feel far more comfortable with or resigned to learning experiences with which they are familiar–being spoken to, taking notes, memorizing to take tests, getting a grade, getting out of the class, and forgetting most of the information. I think most professors feel far more comfortable with teaching experiences with which they are familiar both as past student and teacher–talking, assigning, and grading. At the same time, it behooves us to challenge the students–and ourselves–to learn to stretch beyond their inclinations and learn the benefits of other styles of learning. I think, however, it is important, very important, for our teaching to be varied, to be analytical, creative, practical, traditional, experiential, interactive, passive.

In my classes, if I can use myself as an example, I provide something of structure with a 20 page class syllabus, but provide flexibility so that the students are allowed to change any requirement or schedule as they reasonably see fit. I give weekly short-answer quizzes every Friday however I despise them, but allow students to interact with each other; every Monday we do weekly issue discussions from weekly readings of the student’s choice; I provide 5 minute end of class summaries of the discussion; we debrief and provide structure to whatever we do on that particular day; we write valuative commentaries and questions for each daily reading assignment; we will brain storm details and facts one day; we will mind map those details and facts into issues, processes, themes on another; we will reflect and evaluate with lots of “whys;” we will do role playing on one day, stick drawings on another, skits on still another; there are debates, mime presentations, and games that the student create. We work in groups and are responsible for others; there is opportunity to work alone and let the student be responsible for him or herself. At times, I will talk; and at times I will remain silent forcing them to talk; they have final exams centered on six thematic questions around which the course is wrapped and which they receive in the syllabus at the beginning of the class, but they have the latitude to address any one of those six issues in any manner they as a group wish using whatever medium they decide. We have to write, listen, talk, act, draw, memorize, think, participate, cooperate, collaborate, trust, interact, and sit back. We learn and express in music, art, sculpture, poetry, drama as well as in essay writing and talking. We think, memorize, compare and contrast, take things apart, put things together, experiment, imagine, copy, and create. We allow, require, support, encourage, demand, and relax. We swim against the current and go with the flow.

We’re always performing a high wire balancing act. There are times to talk and times to be silent; there are times to be creative and times to be traditional; there are times to push and times to back off; there are times to control and times to let go. The world isn’t shaped in a way that anyone can have things go only their way. You have to know when it’s better to fight to teach your way and when it’s better to just work within the limits of the student; when its better to stretch yourself and when the time is ripe to stretch the student.

There’s a little something for everyone. And everything for each one. I let them play to their style of learning and expose them to others. I accommodate, challenge and shake them out from their comfortable mould and broaden them; they accommodate me, challenge and broaden me, and never let me get into a comfortable mould.

I’ve heard and read so many of us say of a particular teaching style, “that’s not me” or “it doesn’t fit my personality” or “oh, I can’t do that.” As a ex-talking addict who has been clean for almost three years, I can testify that teaching styles, like learning styles, are not written in stone. Teaching style is not something we’re born with. It’s not built into our DNA code. It’s not an automatic reflex; it’s a learned response. Teaching style is something we develop much later in life. It is something that is more often than not an aping of our own professors. And, what is learned can be relearned. If teachers are interested in changing and improving, if they have a desire to touch all students, if they feel the need to change, then I think they can. Changing isn’t a sign of failure, of rack and ruin. It is an indication of growth and development. It is an indication of growth and development.

Until I started to change, I didn’t realize the extent to which I really under-appreciated the fact that so many students simply think and learn differently than I do and remain relatively untouched, but have within them unimagined and untapped potential.

If we are to be effective teachers, which really means the students–all students–must be effective learners, we MUST vary our style in a sort of mix-and-match fashion. I think we can transcend our own dispositions and reach a broader range of students. It’s not that hard to do. Then, again, it’s not that easy to do either. But, nothing that’s easy is really worth doing.

Make it a good day.

–Louis–

THE CLASSROOM IS A GARDEN, III

Happy New Year! I was out early because I went to sleep early. I don’t do up New Year’s eve with merry making, horn blowing, streamer throwing, and champagne. Maybe that’s because I came within a hare’s breath of being killed by a drunk driver at this time of the year back in 1960. So, I do my darndest to seclude myself from the revelry. I just cooked my wife a quiet candlelight dinner. We snuggled in front of the fireplace as we watched a video, deliciously kissed at midnight, and then turned in.

At this time of the year, it was hard not to think about goodbyes and hellos. Isn’t that what January 1st is for? This is the first day of the year. Like the early morning hours of each day, everything is fresh. There’s time to dream and hope, time to believe. There are no mitigating “buts” and “ifs.” Nothing is screwed up yet. So, I was thinking about goodbyes to old illusions and the hope that they will give way to new hellos about the academic garden.

I often have this odd feeling that so many of us enter the classroom and act as if we had passed through Alice’s looking glass into a page from HOUSE AND GARDEN and dream we are leisurely strolling in a perfectly designed, lush, perfumed, manicured garden. We act as if the landscape of this classroom garden is planted only with the blue-ribbon students. We have this vision that these first-in-shows are resistant to the disfiguring fungi of laziness, the discoloring mildew of unpreparedness, the distorting molds of apathy, the weakening bacteria of confusion, the sapping viruses of disinterest, and the gnawing insects of ignorance. In the immaculately clean beds, the prize-winners stand straight and tall with an eagerness to learn. They have about them the charming sweet aroma of resourcefulness. They are decorated with the vibrant colors of self-motivation and determination. Their sizes and shapes appeal to our tastes. We have this illusion that they virtually grow on their own, needing only occasional fertilizing and a bit of watering. And so, their low maintenance make gardening so easy and undemanding, and we are convinced that we can go about our other more important business and still grow magnificent beauties.

And then, so many of us are shaken from this dream and are confronted with the demands of the real classroom garden in which grow mostly plants which don’t measure up to our ideals. These plants, with their imperfections and vulnerabilities, are not as appealing to our sight and smell. They make gardening more demanding, more difficult, more time consuming, more intrusive on our other and more prestigious projects.

Tending these plants becomes something that we can’t be cavalier about. We can’t go out into the yard when it suits us; we can’t just sprinkle a few drops of water or spread a few grains of fertilizer at our leisure; and we can’t just fit it into an occasional opening in our schedule. If we truly want a beautiful yard, we might have to miss a ball game, a club meeting, an appointment, or delay another activity.

Gardening of this sort is back-breaking, pain-staking, demanding, inconvenient, and not always successful. It’s a constant battle against, to ward of, to eradicate, and to treat the host of diseases, ailments, disorders, and pests to which these real plants are susceptible. We have to mess up our clothes. We have to get down on our knees and bend our backs. We have to expend huge amounts of energy as we till, dig, cultivate, mix, hoe, rake, lug, haul, mulch, treat, clean, apply, and shovel. We have to get dirt under our finger nails, get soil ground into our skin, get callouses on our palms, get sweaty and smelly, suffer a scratch and scrape or cut here and there, endure muscle aches and pains, and get just plain tired.

With our illusion shattered, we are confronted with a reality with which so many of us are either unwilling to deal, unpracticed in dealing, or don’t have the know how with which to deal. We feel betrayed that we are being forced to expend our time and efforts attending to unwanted, bland dandelions when we should be devoting our valuable expertise to caring for coveted, enchanting, and award-winning orchids. “Ah,” so many of us forlornly moan, “if only….” Feeling that we are wasting our talents on flowers that will never take home ribbons, we become disillusioned, disappointed, depressed, discouraged, cynical, crotchety, angry, perhaps even arrogant. We point fingers at these blemished students because they have brought the contaminating diseases and pests of the real world into the pristine, intellectual garden growing in the courtyard of our protected ivory tower. We point fingers at something called society because it made these run-of- the-mill plants–with their blotches, rusts, scales, gall, spotting, scorch, and blight–accessible to our academic garden. We point fingers at peers and outside critics who challenge us to evaluate ourselves as gardeners, who challenge us to define the purpose of gardening, who challenge us to improve our gardening, who challenge us to learn new methods of gardening, and who challenge us to assure that ALL students will have a REAL opportunity to bloom.

In our defense, we wail, “They don’t belong!” “They don’t care the way they used to.” “They don’t know as much as they use to.” “They can’t do as much as they used to.” “They can’t read and write as well as they used to.” “They can’t grasp concepts as quickly.” “They don’t ask questions like they used to.” “They don’t do as well on exams as they used to.” “They aren’t as passionate about their education they used to.” Confronted with a classroom reality that seems to becoming more nightmare and less rhapsody, feeling threatened or offended, so many of us put on sack and ashes, start fasting, walk bare footed, with placards held high, and parade about screaming apocalyptic warnings: “The end of the academic world is at hand.”

I am also often haunted with this eerie sensation that when so many of us lament about students that “they don’t”, we’re really bragging that “we did.” We are taken in by the tricks of unthinking nostalgia. We create an unfair, comparative, romantic, self-satisfying picture of ourselves as flawless prize flowers in the picture-perfect academic garden, impervious to attacking insects and free of destructive diseases, who as students “never did that” and always “use to do.”

We prefer to remember ourselves as students who had stored buckets of elbow grease, gallons of midnight oil, and huge grind stones in our rooms; we were mesmerized by the awe and wonder of learning; we drove ourselves incessantly; we wrote brilliantly; we studied diligently; we spoke eloquently; we asked the insightful questions; we perceptively understood; we zealously pursued wisdom; we selflessly sacrifice for the books; we knew what our future was going to be the second we stepped on campus; we walked the straight and narrow path; we retained our individuality in the face of peer pressure; we put aside the interfering distractions of a job or personal problems; we listened intently as we sat on the edge of our seats; we were all magna cum whatever at graduation. And when we see that students don’t match up to the ideal image we have so often created of ourselves, we raise our placards higher and scream our message of doom louder.

We prefer to think that in our day and on our campuses, the unused fraternity files gathered dust; no one ever had someone write a paper for us or wrote one for someone else or knew anyone who did such things; no one ever cut a corner; no one ever copied a classmate’s lecture notes or let someone copy ours instead of attending class; no one ever crammed merely just to pass a test or to get a class grade; no one was more concerned with the GPA than with quest for knowledge; we were never so bored in class that we memorized the ceiling; we never slept in a class; we never cheated; we never used ponies or crib sheets; no one ever went to a Greek bash or a game instead of studying; no one ever thought that any outside social activity was more important than their academics; no one ever failed a test or flunked a class; no one ever dropped out of school; no one ever reluctantly went along with the crowd; no one ever changed majors like we were playing musical chairs; no one ever came to class without a completed assignment; no one was ever more interested in soaking up more beer than wisdom; no one ever went to class feeling and looking like the morning after the night before; no one ever confusingly or annoyingly asked “is this important” or “why do I have to take this” or “do I need this” or “what can I do with this”; no one was ever concerned more with material wealth rather than the wealth of knowledge.

In this comforting amnesia, we long for a time that never was. We stand in classroom doorways trying to defend and perpetuate an elitism in a society which has decided that access to the academic garden is part of the American birthright. In the eyes of many students and critics, not unfairly, the operational ethos of academia has been described as uncaring and unaccommodating, of increasing questionable social relevance, and acting selfishly defensive. We’re chided for standing up there and doing nothing, or standing up there and do the same stuff in the same way it was handed to us as if the culture of the classroom has not change. We, who are the supposed standard bearers of change, are chastised for being slow to change in times of rapid, lasting change. We’re criticized for indifferently seeing those students who don’t fit our neat mythological picture of the perfect plants properly nestled in the neat precisely arranged academic garden only as unwanted weeds to be coldly discarded on the compost heap. And, I sometimes get the discouraging idea that our educational system is more geared to giving trophies to such research-oriented, weeding-out professors who do just that than to those teaching professors who have arduously and caringly nurtured students to bloom in the garden, that our institutions are better organized for rooting out students than for cultivating their potential.

I don’t think it serves any purpose to self-righteously kevtch. I can’t believe that anyone with a dour outlook in their classes can feel good, satisfaction, accomplishment inside. I find it so negative, so unproductive for both the students and us. I think we can do three things to tap both our rich human resources as well as those of the students.

First, we can start by trying to get pass the dream of what we wish we were and journey to the reality of who we really were. If we go back there ourselves, if we can smell the air ourselves, if we stand in the spot ourselves, we can make the connections with ourselves and with our students. When I remembered and then shared with my students that an A on either my high school or college transcripts would have been a far more lonely soul than a D or a C; that my high school teachers voted me the least likely to succeed of the graduates who were going on to college because they remembered my less than serious devotion to my books; that I wasn’t that perfect student, and I didn’t know very many who were; that neither I nor most of my college classmates comprised a horde of dedicated, brilliant, hard-working, fervent disciples of knowledge; if we soaked up anything, it was beer not wisdom, I found myself talking to a voice within that I had forgotten was there. If we hear that voice, we can use it to talk with the student on common ground, and honestly say, “I understand. I can relate to that. I was there like you. I was once treated as weed and thought I was just a plain ole run-of-the-mill flower. I remember what it was like to be treated that way and act that way. We have a lot in common. You’re just like I was.”

Second, we can start by trying to get pass the dream of what we wish students to be and make contact with the reality of who are, by trying to see each of them as magnificent creations capable of blooming, and by trying to find ways to nourish them and help them bloom. To do that, we first have to know about them, to see them as real people with real hopes and dreams. We have to find their strengths and address their weaknesses. We have to ask, “who are you really?” “Where did you from?” “What do you need?” “What can you do?” “What do you have to work on?” “How can I help you?” “How can I help them help each other?” Using biographical exercises, metaphor exercises, journals, self-evaluation, relaxing the classroom atmosphere, creating an atmosphere of care and trust and respect, small talking and bantering, and other methods of sharing, I have found several emotional factors, systemic debilitating diseases and pests if you will, which, if ignored stunt the students’ ability to thrive. I, as the classroom gardener, must be aware and must treat those ailments if I wish student to truly have an opportunity to thrive and bloom: low self-esteem, diminished sense of self-worth, a history of passive learning, unclear educational goals, alienation from the dominant culture, a lack of information, poor understanding about the options in higher education, little practice in decision-making, lack of experience in time management, inexperience in sustaining commitment to excellence, difficult in making commitments, weak support network in and outside class, peer pressure, personal burdens, and a weak sense of being what I call “street wise.”

And third, we have to win the race between the nourishment of love and the techniques of teaching encouragement on one hand, and professorial slander and student despair and self-denigration on the other. I don’t think it serves any constructive purpose to negatively proclaim what these students supposedly can’t do. Instead, we ought to search out with confidence and belief what they can do. I believe that I’m in the academic garden practicing confrontational gardening. I’m confronting the reality of who the students really are, confronting what they are capable of becoming, confronting the effort I need to make to bring out the potential that lies buried deep within them as well as confronting the purpose and meaning of it all. When it comes to what I do in the classroom, there are no sacred cows. We have to be strong-willed, daring, demanding, imaginative, creative, inventive, sometimes unpredictable, determined, pragmatic, and at other times hard- nosed. My strategy is to show the students the potential I unequivocally believe lays within them, to give them the opportunity and power to make decisions governing themselves, to give them a belief in themselves, and to show them that they have a rightful place in both our academic and society’s garden.

We have to dream big dreams, dreams of not merely being after a class style makeover but realizing that if that take place, it can spills over into a life style makeover and enrich the quality of life in the class and beyond.

If you win the race, well…… When I walk through my garden every morning after my walks, I feel a both spiritual and physical refreshment that helps me put my life in proper perspective. Students, like flowers in a garden, are the pleasures of the campus. There is something challenging and satisfying about taking the time, having the patience, and putting in the hard work to transform a supposed unworthy weed or a run-of- the-mill flower into a thing of beauty, of helping to bring forth hidden beauty into radiant magnificence. When that happens, you help transform the academic garden into something that is truly great; when that happens, you transform yourself into something that is truly great.

Make it a good day.

–Louis–
——–